Make your repository easier—and safer—to use with coding agents.
A repository-specific, evidence-anchored assessment of context, verification, tooling, and review paths for Claude Code, Codex, and similar coding agents.
Scope is confirmed before payment.
Request an audit — $149 View private-response intakeDo not send credentials, tokens, private keys, source archives, or secret values in the initial request.
What you receive
Evidence, not generic advice
A repository-specific scorecard with file, line, and command references.
Prioritized findings
P0/P1/P2 issues with impact, evidence, smallest safe remediation, and verification.
Remediation roadmap
Sequenced actions plus clear unknowns and dependencies.
Automation boundaries
What is safe to automate, what needs human approval, and what should not be automated.
How it works
NOT_RUN.We review
- Repository structure and discoverability
- Project memory and instruction hierarchy
- Context quality and contradictions
- Test, lint, build, and verification paths
- Tool permissions and secret-exposure risks
- Branch, review, release, and rollback workflows
Base boundaries
- No repository writes or pull requests
- No production deployment or credential access
- No penetration test or legal certification
- No bespoke implementation
- No guarantee of security, productivity, revenue, compatibility, or defect-free software
NOT_RUN; missing evidence is never relabeled as PASS.Capacity and follow-up
Initial capacity is limited to 2 concurrent accepted audits and 4 accepted audits per rolling 30 days. One clarification round is included within 7 days; confirmed factual errors reported within 14 days are corrected without expanding scope.
Request an audit